Apple AirPods Pro 3 Special Edition Brand New & Sealed

@Switcheroo Ah, so let me get this straight: I am now expected to prove my innocence, rather than you being expected to substantiate the claim you made when you publicly accused my listing of being fraudulent. Very well.

I have just uploaded the redacted copy of the original invoice you requested, with the relevant personal information removed.

And, thanks to your accusation, I have now had to take the time and trouble to do all of this: locate the invoice, upload it, go through it line by line, determine which information could potentially be relevant or sensitive, seek advice on what should be redacted, and then manually remove each piece of personal information — something I am actually quite uncomfortable having to do with a document of this nature.

All of this because you decided to publicly accuse me of fraud based on an assumption about a product you clearly knew nothing about.

The evidence is now there for you to examine. I trust you will judge it on its merits and reconsider the accusation you made.

For the record, it should never have been me having to explain and prove the legitimacy of my listing in the first place. You were the one making the accusation, and therefore the responsibility for substantiating it was yours.

Next time, please establish your facts before making accusations. It would save everyone an entirely unnecessary amount of time and trouble.

Yet another know-it-all who has absolutely no idea what he is talking about, yet somehow feels completely qualified to make such a confident accusation. How can you be so confidently wrong about something you clearly know absolutely nothing about?

I am an Apple employee. I purchased these AirPods myself through the EPP (Employee Purchase Program), and I have the original invoice in my own name proving that I purchased them.

You are making a very confident statement about a product and an employee offering that you clearly know absolutely nothing about. These are a special edition made available to Apple employees, and they were offered to us through our employee programme. We had to purchase them ourselves.

This is actually the second time this year that Apple employees — at least here in Cork, and I believe more widely — have been offered a special-edition pair of AirPods Pro 3 through the EPP.

So your statement that Special Editions are released in select Asian markets and “don’t require employee status to purchase” simply does not apply to the particular edition I am selling. You have taken a general statement about Special Editions and somehow decided that it proves you know what this specific product is. It doesn’t.

If you still doubt it, I can even provide the serial number. You can verify it directly through Apple’s Check Coverage website and see that these are genuine AirPods Pro 3. They are also still within the eligibility period for AppleCare+.

I genuinely don’t understand how someone can have absolutely no knowledge of the particular product they are commenting on, yet feel confident enough to publicly accuse another person of running a fraudulent listing.

Before making accusations like this, make sure you actually know what you are talking about. In this case, you very clearly don’t.

@Switcheroo: Perfecto. Ahora sí: su mensaje exacto. Y tienes razón en que hay que responder a lo que realmente afirma, no a una interpretación mía.

La respuesta completa, con bastante mala leche pero sin los insultos que tú mismo me dijiste que no quieres poner, sería:

Yet another know-it-all who has absolutely no idea what he is talking about, yet somehow feels completely qualified to make such a confident accusation. How can you be so confidently wrong about something you clearly know absolutely nothing about?

I am an Apple employee. I purchased these AirPods myself through the EPP (Employee Purchase Program), and I have the original invoice in my own name proving that I purchased them.

You are making a very confident statement about a product and an employee offering that you clearly know absolutely nothing about. These are a special edition made available to Apple employees, and they were offered to us through our employee programme. We had to purchase them ourselves.

This is actually the second time this year that Apple employees — at least here in Cork, and I believe more widely — have been offered a special-edition pair of AirPods Pro 3 through the EPP.

So your statement that Special Editions are released in select Asian markets and “don’t require employee status to purchase” simply does not apply to the particular edition I am selling. You have taken a general statement about Special Editions and somehow decided that it proves you know what this specific product is. It doesn’t.

If you still doubt it, I can even provide the serial number. You can verify it directly through Apple’s Check Coverage website and see that these are genuine AirPods Pro 3. They are also still within the eligibility period for AppleCare+.

I genuinely don’t understand how someone can have absolutely no knowledge of the particular product they are commenting on, yet feel confident enough to publicly accuse another person of running a fraudulent listing.

Before making accusations like this, make sure you actually know what you are talking about. In this case, you very clearly don’t.